Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA JUDGMENTS AND ORDERS – claims for restitution and damages relating to the same loss – orders made on appeal for restitution to be made by one of the parties - other parties had paid damages pursuant to primary judge's orders which were not stayed pending appeal – claimed that party subject to restitution order should recoup to the parties paying damages the amount by which the payments effectively discharged the obligation to make restitution – repayment of moneys paid pursuant to a judgment which is set aside on appeal
PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – INDEMNITY COSTS – indemnity costs sought on the basis of rejected Calderbank offers – relevance of conditional offer on court's discretion to order indemnity costs – relevance to discretion of alleged lack of merit in unsuccessful appeals Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) ss 25 and 28(1) Duralla Pty Ltd v Plant (1984) 54 ALR 29 cited Petreski v Cargill (1987) 18 FCR 68 cited
Government Insurance Office of New South Wales v Healy [No 2] (1991) 22 NSWLR 380 cited
The Commonwealth of Australia v McCormack (1984) 155 CLR 273 cited
Burke v Gillett [1996] 1 VR 196 cited
Re Ryan; Ex Parte Ryan v Jupiter's Management Ltd (1992) 38 FCR 127 cited
AMADIO PTY LTD AND ANOTHER v RUSSELL FRASER HENDERSON AND OTHERS VG 244, 245, 248, 249, 250 AND 252 OF 1996
JUDGES: NORTHROP, RYAN AND MERKEL JJ DATE: 28 AUGUST 1998 PLACE: MELBOURNE
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA [general distribution]
VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY VG 244 of 1996
VG 245 of 1996
VG 248 of 1996
VG 249 of 1996
VG 250 of 1996
VG 252 of 1996
ON APPEAL FROM a judge of THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate