Federal Court of Australia
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA NG 8183 of 1997
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY NG 8366 of 1997
In the Matter of Eric Abraham Jury
NG 8183 of 1997
BETWEEN: andrew craig ashton
Applicant
AND: MAXWELL WILLIAM PRENTICE
Respondent
MAXWELL WILLIAM PRENTICE
Cross-Claimant
ANDREW CRAIG ASHTON
First Cross-Respondent
ERIC ABRAHAM JURY (SNR)
Second Cross-Respondent
Sonia sadie JURY
third Cross-Respondent
william abRAHAM JURY
Fourth Cross-Respondent
houda jury
fifth Cross-Respondent
NG 8366 of 1997
BETWEEN: NAUEN HOLDINGS PTY LIMITED (acn 002 738 123)
Applicant
AND: MAXWELL WILLIAM PRENTICE
Respondent
JUDGE: HILL J
DATE OF ORDER: 1 SEPTEMBER 1998
WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. The application for an adjournment of the proceedings be denied. 2. The Applicants pay the Respondents' costs of the application for adjournment. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules
NO QUESTION OF PRINCIPLE
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA NG 8183 of 1997
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY NG 8366 of 1997
In the Matter of Eric Abraham Jury
NG 8183 of 1997 BETWEEN: andrew craig ashton
Applicant
AND: MAXWELL WILLIAM PRENTICE
Respondent
MAXWELL WILLIAM PRENTICE
Cross-Claimant
ANDREW CRAIG ASHTON
First Cross-Respondent
ERIC ABRAHAM JURY (SNR)
Second Cross-Respondent
Sonia sadie JURY
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate