Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
IMMIGRATION – Refugee Review Tribunal – applicant's entitlement to a reasonable opportunity to give evidence – decision given in his absence owing to illness – reasons of Tribunal referring to his absence but not to the circumstances – error of law in failure to set out reasons and findings on that matter – error of law in failure to give the applicant an opportunity to appear to give evidence – requirement to act according to substantial justice.
Migration Act 1958, ss 420, 425, 430, 476(1)(a)
Eshetu v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (1997) 71 FCR 300, followed
The Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Guo (1997) 144 ALR 567, followed
Budiyal v The Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs (Tamberlin J, unreported, 20 March 1998), followed
Jones v Dunkel (1959) 101 CLR 298, applied
CAPITLY V MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS
NG 821 of 1997
Burchett J
Sydney
24 September 1998
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY NG 821 of 1997
BETWEEN: ARIEL CAPITLY
Applicant
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS
Respondent
JUDGE: BURCHETT J
DATE OF ORDER: 24 september 1998
WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. The decision under review be set aside; 2. The matter be remitted to the Refugee Review Tribunal, differently constituted, for decision according to law; 3. The respondent Minister pay the applicant's costs. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY NG 821 of 1997
BETWEEN: ARIEL CAPITLY
Applicant
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS
Respondent
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate