Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
INCOME TAX – thin capitalisation - attributable income of controlled foreign corporation ("CFC") – Part X and Division 16F of Part III Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 ("the Act") –whether attributable income of a CFC should be calculated without regard to interest payable because of the operation of Division 16F of Part III of the Act concerned with thin capitalisation – relationship between Part X and Division 16F of Part III of the Act considered
INCOME TAX – debt defeasance – whether in calculating attributable income in respect of CFC a defeasance profit is to be treated as adjusted tainted income or passive income – nature of the business of CFC considered – whether CFC carried on business as a finance company – characterisation of defeasance profit
INTERPRETATION – principles applicable in interpretation of taxation Act – relevance of subsequent legislation in ascertaining legislative purpose. Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (Cth) – ss 159GZA, 159GZC, 159GZE, 159GZF, 159GZS, 316, 381, 382, 383, 384, 386, 446(1)(d), 446(1)(j), 446(1)(k), 456 Part X, Division 16F Part III
WORDS AND PHRASES "attributable income"; "thin capitalisation"; "debt defeasance"; "adjusted income"; "adjusted tainted income"; "passive income"; "factoring"; "in the nature of interest" CIC Insurance Ltd v Bankstown Football Club Ltd (1997) 187 CLR – cited Federal Commissioner of Taxation v Australia and New Zealand Savings Bank Ltd (1998) 156 ALR 570 – cited Cooper Brookes (Wollongong) Pty Ltd v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1981) 147 CLR 297 – referred to Grain Elevators Board (Victoria) v President, Councillors and Ratepayers of the Shire of Dunmunkle Corporation (1946) 73 CLR 70 – cited Cape Brandy Syndicate v Inland Revenue Commissioners [1921] 2 KB 403 – cited Hepples v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1991) 102 ALR 497 – cited Avco Financial Services Limited v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1981-2) 150 CLR 510 – considered Coles Myer Finance Limited v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1993) 176 CLR 640 – considered Federal Commissioner of Taxation v Unilever Australia Securities Ltd (1996) 56FCR 152 – considered Federal Commissioner of Taxation v Orica Ltd (1998) 154 ALR 1 – considered London Australia Investment Co Ltd v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1977) 138 CLR 106 – cited National Bank of Australasia Ltd v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1969) 118 CLR 529 – cited Litchfield v Dreyfus [1906] 1 KB 584 – referred to Edgelow v MacElwee [1918] 1 KB 205 – cited Federal Commissioner of Taxation v Bivona Pty Ltd (1990) 21 FCR 562 – referred to Californian Copper Syndicate Ltd v Harris (Surveyor of Taxes) (1904) 5 TC 159 – referred to Modern Permanent Building and Investment Society v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1958) 98 CLR 187 – referred to Re: Farm Security Act 1944 of the Province of Saskatchewan [1947] SCR 394 – cited Century Yuasa Batteries Pty Ltd v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1997) 97 ATC 4299 – cited Century Yuasa Batteries Pty Ltd v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1998) 98 ATC 4380 – cited
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate