Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY NG 83 of 1998
BETWEEN: GABI FOUAD ZAYOUT
Applicant
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND
MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS
Respondent
JUDGE: HILL J
DATE OF ORDER: 30 OCTOBER 1998
WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. The application be dismissed. 2. There be no order as to costs. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY NG 83 of 1998
BETWEEN: GABI FOUAD ZAYOUT
Applicant
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS
Respondent
JUDGE: HILL J
DATE: 30 OCTOBER 1998
PLACE: SYDNEY
EX TEMPORE REASONS FOR JUDGMENT The Applicant, Mr Zayout, applies to the Court to review the decision of the Refugee Review Tribunal ("the Tribunal") affirming a decision of the Respondent Minister not to grant to him a protection visa. Such a visa would be granted to an applicant in circumstances where the Minister or, on review, the Tribunal is satisfied that the Applicant is a person to whom Australia has protection obligations under the United Nations Convention relating to the Status of Refugees 1951 as amended by the Protocol relating to the Status of Refugees 1967. The Applicant submits that the Tribunal in its reasons has made an error of law. The making of such an error is a ground of review under the provisions of s 476(1)(e) of the Migration Act 1958 ("the Act"). The error of law contended for is that the Tribunal in finding that what happened to the Applicant between 1986 until 1994 was not persecution for a Convention reason applied the wrong test in the same way as I found the Tribunal had done in an earlier case: Mohamed Dahir Mohamed v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (unreported, 11 May 1998).
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate