Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
IMMIGRATION ‑ Protection visa ‑ Applicant required to satisfy public interest criteria ‑ Criterion that applicant is not assessed by competent Australian authorities to be risk to national security ‑ Australian Security Intelligence Organisation assesses applicant a risk to national security ‑ Refusal of visa on ground that public interest criterion not satisfied ‑ Whether ASIO "competent Australian authorities" to assess risk to national security ‑ Power of Administrative Appeals Tribunal to review refusal. Migration Act 1958, ss 31, 36, 65(1), 202, 500(1)(c) Migration Regulations, Sch 2 cl 866.225, pic 4002 Refugees Convention, art 33(2) Australian Security Intelligence Organisation Act 1979, s 37(1)(c)
Chu v Minister for Immigration (1997) 78 FCR 314 cited Re Borovski & Weinbaum; Ex parte Salaman [1902] 2 KB 313 considered Reg v Secretary of State for the Home Department; Ex parte Santillo [1981] QB 778 considered Haj‑Ismail v Madigan (1982) 45 ALR 379 cited
DIRECTOR GENERAL SECURITY v NASHMY OBED SULTAN and MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS
VG 396 of 1998
SUNDBERG J 1 DECEMBER 1998 MELBOURNE
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY VG 396 of 1998
BETWEEN: director general security
Applicant
AND: nashmy obed sultan
First Respondent
minister for immigration and multicultural affairs
Second Respondent
JUDGE: SUNDBERG J
DATE OF ORDER: 3 DECEMBER 1998
WHERE MADE: MELBOURNE
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. The order of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal made on 11 August 1998 be set aside. 2. The matter be remitted to the Tribunal with a direction that the application made to it on 21 April 1998 be dismissed on the ground that it is frivolous or vexatious, and a direction that the confidential documents be returned to the second respondent's solicitor. 3. The first respondent pay the applicant's and second respondent's taxed costs of the application. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate