Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE Ð application by respondent (ÒACCCÓ) for summary dismissal or striking out of pleadings Ð whether pleadings disclose a reasonable cause of action arising out of earlier proceeding by ACCC against company Ð defamation of company by ACCC Ð whether pleaded defamatory imputations capable of being conveyed by information issued by ACCC about its earlier proceeding Ð whether appropriate to determine capacity when dispute as to nature and extent of publication of matter complained of Ð whether aggravated and exemplary damages properly pleaded and particularised Ð injurious falsehood Ð whether elements of tort properly pleaded Ð abuse of process Ð whether elements of tort properly pleaded Ð misleading and deceptive conduct Ð whether acts complained of Òin trade or commerceÓ Ð misuse of market power Ð whether properly pleaded that respondent Òtook advantage ofÓ alleged market power Ð misfeasance in public office Ð whether elements of tort properly pleaded Ð intentional infliction of economic harm and interference with contractual relations Ð whether elements of torts properly pleaded Ð judicial review Ð whether decisions of ACCC to commence earlier proceeding and to issue information about it Òdecisions made under an enactmentÓ within the meaning of s 3 (1) of the Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977 (Cth) Ð whether proceeding should continue under Part IVA of Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) Ð whether causes of action pleaded on behalf of group members. WORDS AND PHRASES Ð Òunder an enactmentÓ
Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth), s 33N Defamation Act 1974 (NSW), s 46. Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977 (Cth), s 3 (1) Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) National Mutual Property Services (Australia) Pty Ltd v Citibank Savings Ltd (1995) 132 ALR 514, referred to Australian Building Industries Pty Ltd v Stramit Corporation Ltd, unreported, FCA/FC, 1 December 1997, referred to Sims v Wran [1984] 1 NSWLR 317, considered McNicol v ACT Health Authority unreported, SC/ACT, referred to Lazarus v Deutsche Lufthansa AG (1985) 1 NSWLR 188, referred to Love v Mirror Newspapers Ltd [1980] 2 NSWLR, considered Monte v Mirror Newspapers Ltd [1979] 2 NSWLR, referred to Capital and Counties Bank Ltd v George Henty and Sons (1882) 7 App Cas 741, considered Mirror Newspapers Ltd v Harrison (1982) 149 CLR 293, considered Rigby v John Fairfax Group Pty Ltd unreported, CA (NSW), 1 February 1996, referred to Jones v TCN Channel Nine Pty Ltd, unreported, SC (NSW)/Hunt CJ at CL, 7 April 1992, considered P J Holdings Australia Pty Ltd v Hughes (1979) 25 ALR 538, considered Watt v General Television Corp Pty Ltd [1998] 3 VR 501, referred to Swimsure (Laboratories) Pty Ltd v McDonald [1979] 2 NSWLR 796, considered White Industries (Qld) Pty Ltd v Flower & Hart (a firm) (1998) 156 ALR 169, considered Hanrahan v Ainsworth (1990) 22 NSWLR 73, referred to Concrete Constructions (NSW) Pty Ltd v Nelson (1990) 169 CLR 594, considered Queensland Wire Industries Pty Ltd v Broken Hill Proprietary Co Ltd (1989) 167 CLR 177, referred to Sanders v Snell (1998) 157 ALR 491, considered Northern Territory v Mengel (1995) 185 CLR 307, considered Allen v Flood [1898] AC 1, referred to McKernan v Fraser (1931) 46 CLR 343, referred to General Newspapers Pty Ltd v Telstra Corp (1993) 45 FCR 164, applied Strictly Stainless Pty Ltd v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation, unreported, FCA/Davies J, 7 November 1993, referred to Ruddy v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation, unreported, FCA/Kiefel J, 2 April 1998, referred to Salerno v National Crime Authority (1997) 144 ALR 709, referred to GIRAFFE WORLD AUSTRALIA PTY LIMITED (ACN 078 012 521) V AUSTRALIAN COMPETITION AND CONSUMER COMMISSION
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate