Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
CATCHWORDS
ABORIGINES – Native title – Native Title Act 1993 – application for a determination of native title – claim to ownership and exclusive possession, occupation, use and enjoyment of land, waters and natural resources.
EVIDENCE – Native title – proof of descent from indigenous inhabitants – proof of traditional laws and customs of ancestors – evidence based upon oral tradition – use of historical and ethnographic material – whether continued acknowledgment and observance of traditional laws and customs. Aboriginal Land Rights Act 1983 (NSW) s 22; Crown Lands Occupation Act 1861 (NSW); Irrigation Act 1912 (NSW); Irrigation Corporations Act 1994 (NSW); Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) ss 3, 23B, 23C, 23E, 47A, 47B, 61, 82, 94A, 223, 225, 237A, 253; Native Title Amendment Act 1998 (Cth) Schedule 5, Part 3 item 8, Part 5 item 24, Part 9 item 36; River Murray Waters Act 1915 (Cth); Water Act 1912 (NSW).
Fejo v Northern Territory 156 ALR 721 Refd; Mabo v Queensland (No 2) 175 CLR 1 Appl; Re Mining Lease Application No 70149, unreported, Supreme Court of Queensland, 5 June 1998 Appl; The Wik Peoples v Queensland 187 CLR l Refd; United States v Santa Fe Pacific Railroad Co (1941) 314 US 339 Refd; Western Australia v The Commonwealth 183 CLR 373 Refd.
THE MEMBERS OF THE YORTA YORTA ABORIGINAL COMMUNITY v THE STATE OF VICTORIA AND OTHERS. VG No 6001 OF 1995
OLNEY J MELBOURNE 18 DECEMBER 1998
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY No VG 6001 of 1995
between:
the members of the yorta yorta aboriginal community
Applicants
AND
THE STATE OF VICTORIA AND OTHERS
Respondents
DETERMINATION OF NATIVE TITLE PURSUANT TO THE NATIVE TITLE ACT
JUDGE: OLNEY J
DATE OF ORDER: 18 DECEMBER 1998
WHERE MADE: MELBOURNE
The Court determines that native title does not exist in relation to the areas of land and waters identified in Schedule D to Native Title Determination Application VN 94/1 accepted by The Native Title Registrar on 26 May 1994. NOTE: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in rule 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate