Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – joinder – Mareva Injunction - transfer of property – whether serious question to be tried - whether reasonably arguable that assets of respondents and prospective respondents could be diminished or dissipated – balance of convenience.
Federal Court of Australia Act 1976, (Cth) s 23 Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth), s 121 LED Builders Pty Limited v Eagle Homes Pty Limited (1997) 78 FCR 65, applied Jackson v Sterling Industries Pty Limited (1987) 162 CLR 612, followed NATIONAL AUSTRALIA BANK LIMITED V ILANA ELENKA STERN AND JOSEPH POLLAK
NG 936 OF 1996 TAMBERLIN J SYDNEY 21 DECEMBER 1998
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY NG 936 of 1996
BETWEEN: national australia bank limited
Applicant
AND: ilana elenka stern
First Respondent
joseph pollak
Second Respondent
Harry stern
Third Respondent
Aana pollak
fourth respondent
stern nominees pty limited
fifth respondent
JUDGE: TAMBERLIN J
DATE OF ORDER: 21 DEcember 1998
WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
ORDERS IN RESPECT OF HARRY STERN, AANA POLLAK AND STERN NOMINEES PTY LIMITED
Upon the Applicant giving to the Court: (a) the usual undertakings as to damages; and (b) an undertaking to keep the terms of the following orders confidential and, in particular, not to communicate the terms of such order to any other financial institution or financial reporting agency. The Court orders that: 1. Harry Stern, Aana Pollak and Stern Nominees Pty limited be joined as third, fourth and fifth respondents in proceedings NG 149 of 1996, NG 936 of 1996 and NG 81 of 1998. 2. Until further order, each of the third, fourth and fifth respondents be restrained from selling, disposing of or dealing with any interest in any assets whatsoever and wherever situated in which they have had any interest transferred to them either directly or indirectly by the first two respondents after 1 January 1994 without giving the solicitor for the Applicant at least twenty-eight days prior written notice. 3. Within fourteen days from the date hereof, the third, fourth and fifth respondents file and serve on the Applicant, affidavits giving details of their interests in any property whatsoever and wherever situated, transferred to them either directly or indirectly by the first two respondents, after 1 January 1994 and giving full details as to any sale, disposition or dealing by either of them of any interest in any such property. 4. The third, fourth and fifth respondents pay the costs of the Applicant on this application in relation to the orders made against them. 5. Liberty to apply on 24 hours notice.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate