Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Petersville Ltd v Peters (WA) Ltd [1999] FCA 5
RESTRAINT OF TRADE – sale of business – first applicant and predecessor of second applicant manufactured and sold ice-cream in Western Australia under the name "Pauls" in competition with the respondent – respondent purchased that business in 1983 – sale agreement included covenant precluding applicants from selling any ice-cream in Western Australia for a minimum period of nearly 15 years and, at respondent's option, for further periods extending the restraint to a period of nearly 30 years – vendors granted respondent licence to use Pauls names, know-how and technical and marketing information ("the licensing arrangements") – whether the licensing arrangements took the restraint out of the doctrine of common law restraint of trade – whether the restraint was reasonable as between the parties – whether the restraint was reasonable in the public interest – whether the Court could or should deny declaratory relief on equitable grounds– whether the restraint was solely for the protection of goodwill within s 51(2)(e) of the Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) s 51(2)(e) Esso Petroleum Co Ltd v Harper's Garage (Stourport) Ltd [1968] AC 269 applied Nordenfelt v Maxim Nordenfelt Guns and Ammunition Co, Ltd [1894] AC 535 referred to Trego v Hunt [1896] AC 7 referred to Attwood v Lamont [1920] 3 KB 571 at 584-586 referred to Amoco Aust Pty Ltd v Rocca Bros Motor Engineering Pty Ltd (1974) 133 CLR 288 applied Peters American Delicacy Co Ltd v Patricia's Chocolates (1947) 77 CLR 574 referred to Adamson v NSW Rugby League (1991) 103 ALR 319 referred to Bridge v Deacons [1984] AC 705 referred to Butt v Long (1953) 88 CLR 476 at 486 applied Herbert Morris Ltd v Saxelby [1916] AC 688 referred to Federal Commissioner of Taxation v Murry (1998) 155 ALR 67 referred to Connors Bros Ltd v Connors [1940] 4 All ER 179 followed Mayfair Trading Co. Pty Ltd v Dreyer (1958) 101 CLR 428 referred to Geraghty v Minter (1979) 142 CLR 177 referred to PETERSVILLE LTD and PETERS FOODS AUSTRALIA PTY LTD v PETERS (WA) LIMITED
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate