Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA Nordland Papier AG v Anti‑Dumping Authority [1999] FCA 10 CUSTOMS AND EXCISE – anti‑dumping – application to review decision of Minister, on recommendation of Anti‑Dumping Authority, to publish dumping duty notices in respect of coated paper exported to Australia – ascertainment of "normal value" of goods – whether applicant's domestic sales were arms length transactions – whether a rebate such as a volume rebate may be regarded as a reimbursement, compensation or benefit for, or in respect of, the whole or any part of the price – rebate compared to discount STATUTORY INTERPRETATION – effect of international instruments such as GATT on construction of statute – whether legislative amendments are reliable indicators of parliamentary intent at time of original enactment WORDS AND PHRASES – "normal value", "arms length transactions", "rebate", "price", "in respect of", "reimbursement" Customs Act 1901 (Cth), ss 269TAA, 269TAB, 269TAC, 269TB, 269TD, 269TG Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977 (Cth), s 11(1)(c) and s 13 Customs Legislation (Anti‑dumping Amendments) Act 1998 (Cth), s 22 and s 25 Toyota Motor Sales Australia Ltd v Collector of Customs (1991) 28 FCR 27 at 29 cited Queensland Independent Wholesalers Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation (1991) 29 FCR 312 cited Hyundai Automotive Distributors Australia Pty Ltd v Chief Executive Officer Australian Customs Service [1998] FCA 297 cited Colgate Palmolive Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation (1998) 98 ATC 4748 applied Trustees Executors & Agency Co Ltd v Reilly [1941] VLR 110 at 111 cited Powers v Maher (1959) 103 CLR 478 at 484, 485 cited State Government Insurance Office (Qld) v Crittenden (1966) 117 CLR 412 at 416 cited Frost v Collector of Customs (1985) 9 FCR 174 cited ICI Australia Operations Pty Ltd v Fraser (1991) 34 FCR 564 at 569, 570 cited Rocklea Spinning Mills Pty Ltd v Anti‑Dumping Authority (1995) 56 FCR 406 at 417 cited North Sydney Municipal Council v PD Mayoh Pty Ltd (1988) 14 NSWLR 740 at 745 cited L Vogel & Son Pty Ltd v Anderson (1968) 120 CLR 157 at 162, 169 cited Kalwy v Secretary, Department of Social Security (1992) 38 FCR 295 at 299 cited Grain Elevators Board of Victoria v Shire of Dunmunkle (1946) 73 CLR 70 at 86 referred to Interlego AG v Croner Trading Pty Ltd (1992) 39 FCR 348 at 382 cited Re Samuel [1913] AC 514 at 526 referred to Callow v Commissioner of Taxation (1997) 73 FCR 421 at 426 cited
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate