Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Cong Tam Dang v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs
[1999] FCA 38 MIGRATION - criminal deportation - whether the Administrative Appeals Tribunal erred in the test it applied to the risk of the applicant reoffending - whether the Tribunal applied the wrong test in determining whether to deport the applicant - whether the Tribunal failed to properly consider the effect of deportation on the applicant and his family - whether Tribunal failed to take into account relevant considerations - distinction between failure to consider certain evidence and failure to consider relevant factors - whether questionable findings of fact gave rise to legal error - effect of inappropriate language in the Tribunal's reasons for decision.
Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth) s 44 Migration Act 1958 (Cth) s 200
Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Wu Shan Liang (1996) 185 CLR 259 Re Salazar-Arbelaez v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (1977) 18 ALR 36 Minister for Immigration, Local Government and Ethnic Affairs v Gray (1994) 50 FCR 189 Walsh v Department of Employment Education Training and Youth Affairs (unreported, R D Nicholson J, 9 April 1998)
CONG TAM DANG v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS NG 601 of 1998 MOORE J 2 FEBRUARY 1999 SYDNEY
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY NG 601 OF 1998
BETWEEN: CONG TAM DANG
Applicant
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS
Respondent
JUDGE: MOORE J
DATE OF ORDER: 2 FEBRUARY 1999
WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. The application is dismissed. 2. No order as to costs.
Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate