Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Naz v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs
[1999] FCA 97
IMMIGRATION – refugee application – review of decision of Refugee Review Tribunal – claim of well-founded fear of persecution on basis of membership of a group comprising Muslim women who speak out against the oppression of Muslim women in Bangladesh or who do not follow accepted codes of behaviour, or both – applicant's family part of very wealthy elite in relative terms – father murdered by large band of robbers in applicant's presence – applicant subsequently received threats to dissuade her from giving evidence – applicant physically attacked by group which included some involved in father's murder – attack in class when teaching local Muslim women – applicant ceased teaching activities – Tribunal found threats to applicant designed to deter her from giving evidence, not for a Convention reason – thereafter applicant continued role in running family business – Tribunal did not accept certain aspects of applicant's evidence – Tribunal found no real chance of persecution if applicant returned to Bangladesh – also found it would be reasonable for applicant to relocate to Dhaka City – whether error of law.
Eshetu v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (1997) 71 FCR 300 followed Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Guo (1997) 144 ALR 567 referred to Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Wu Shan Liang (1996) 185 CLR 259 referred to
FARHANA NAZ, SALEQUE RAHMAN and RAFIYA NAZ v.
MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS
No N4 of 1999
CARR J PERTH 10 FEBRUARY 1999
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY N 4 of 1999
BETWEEN: FARHANA NAZ, SALEQUE RAHMAN and
RAFIYA NAZ
Applicant
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate