Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs v Seligman [1999] FCA 117
ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – immigration law – grant of visa – Public Interest Criteria in Item 4005, Schedule 4 – whether grant of visa would "result in a significant cost to the Australian community in the areas of health care or community services" – provision of opinion by Medical Officer to the Minister as set down in reg 2.25 – purports to regulate the way in which the Medical Officer determines the question of cost to the Australian community – required to consider the person's need and eligibility for health care and community services without regard to whether person will use it – Minister required by subreg 2.25A(3) to take opinion to be "correct" in deciding whether person satisfies a criterion – consideration of regulation making power under s 505 Migration Act 1958 (Cth) – reg 2.25B invalid because beyond power conferred by s 505 – cuts down range of considerations to be taken into account – whether decision of Medical Officer judicially reviewable decision – whether a disability related government pension falls within the concept of "community services" – consideration of the policy to limit entry into Australia of persons likely to be a financial burden on Australian community. Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 65 and 505 Migration Regulations regs 2.25A, 2.25B and Sch 4 item 4005 Manokian v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (1997) 48 ALD 632 discussed Australian Broadcasting Tribunal v Bond (1990) 170 CLR 321 referred to Coleman v Gray (1994) 55 FCR 412 cited MINISTER FOR IMMIGATION & MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS v NORMAN SELIGMAN NG 391 OF 1998 FRENCH, NORTH AND MERKEL JJ MELBOURNE 1 MARCH 1999
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY NG 391 OF 1998
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate