Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA Eagle Homes Pty Ltd v Austec Homes Pty Ltd [1999] FCA 138 COPYRIGHT – infringement – floor plans of project homes – reproduction of whole or substantial part – whether sufficient similarity between copyright plan and allegedly infringing plan – whether case one of copying of whole or of substantial part – meaning of "substantial part" – degree of protection to be afforded to floor plans of project homes – relevance of common features possessed by such plans – two aspects of reproduction, that is, subjective copying and sufficient objective similarity – relevance of finding of actual copying – distinction between idea and expression – role of appellate court in reviewing finding of trial judge that plans not sufficiently similar to amount to "reproduction".
Copyright Act 1968 (Cth) ss 14(1), 31(1)(b)(i) S W Hart & Co Pty Ltd v Edwards Hot Water Systems (1985) 159 CLR 466, referred to Beck v Montana Constructions Pty Ltd [1964-5] NSWR 229, considered Lend Lease Homes Pty Ltd v Warrigal Homes Pty Ltd [1970] 3 NSWLR 265, referred to Ancher Mortlock Murray & Woolley Pty Ltd v Hooker Homes Pty Ltd [1971] 2 NSWLR 278, applied Dixon Investments Pty Ltd v Hall (1990) 18 IPR 481 (FCA/Pincus J), referred to University of London Press Ltd v University Tutorial Press Ltd [1916] 2 Ch 601, considered Ladbroke (Football) Ltd v William Hill (Football) Ltd [1964] 1 WLR 273, considered Autodesk Inc v Dyason [No 2] (1993) 176 CLR 300, referred to Warwick Film Productions Ltd v Eisinger [1969] 1 Ch 508, distinguished Dixon Investments Pty Ltd v Hall (1990) 18 IPR 490 (FC), referred to Ownit Homes Pty Ltd v Mancuso Investments Pty Ltd (1988) AIPC 90-488, referred to LED Builders Pty Ltd v Masterton Homes (NSW) Pty Ltd (1994) 30 IPR 447, considered Kenrick & Co v Lawrence & Co (1890) 25 QBD 99, distinguished Beazley Homes Ltd v Arrowsmith [1978] 1 NZLR 394, considered Hanfstaengl v Baines & Co [1895] AC 20, referred to MacMillan & Co Ltd v Cooper (1923) 40 TLR 186, considered Blackie & Sons Ltd v Lothian Book Publishing Co Pty Ltd (1921) 29 CLR 396, applied Commissioner of Taxation v Chubb Australia Ltd (1995) 56 FCR 557 at 560, referred to Biogen Inc v Medeva PLC [1997] RPC 1 at 45, referred to Esso Australia Resources Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation (1998) 98 ATC 4768 at 4779 referred to S & I Publishing Pty Ltd v Australian Surf Lifesaver Pty Ltd (1999) ATPR 41-667 at 42,505, referred to Preston Erection Pty Limited v Speedy Gantry Hire Pty Limited [1998] FCA 1615 at 9-10, referred to Beneficial Finance Corporation Ltd v Karavas (1991) 23 NSWLR 256, referred to George Mitchell (Chesterhall Ltd) v Finney Lock Seeds Ltd [1983] 2 AC 803 at 816, referred to Devries v Australian National Railways Commission (1993) 177 CLR 472 at 479, referred to Warren v Coombes (1979) 142 CLR 531, referred to Coghlan v Cumberland [1898] 1 Ch 704 at 704-5, referred to Bradbury v Hotten (1872) 8 LR Ex 1, referred to Chappell & Co Ltd v DC Thompson & Co Ltd [1928-35] MacG Cop Cas 467, referred to
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate