Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Melbourne v Relativity Pty Ltd [1999] FCA 160 BANKRUPTCY - application to set aside a bankruptcy notice - judgment debt arose from a costs order of a prior proceeding - whether debtor able to demonstrate a counter claim, set-off or cross demand equal to or exceeding the amount of the judgment debt - whether failure of respondent creditor to pay all agreed monies gave rise to a breach of an earlier agreement between the parties - whether the respondent creditor had breached an implied term to cooperate as joint venturer - whether there existed a conspiracy aimed at injuring the debtor - whether respondent creditor committed a trespass to the debtor's property - whether trespass alleged could give rise to an action in tort for unliquidated damages capable of offsetting the judgment debt - question of ownership of the trespassed goods - whether debtor's affidavits demonstrated or quantified the damages arising from the alleged counter claim - whether counter claim had a reasonable prospect of success - consideration of the bona fides of the debtor's claim.
Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) s 40(1)(g) & 41(7)
Ebert v The Union Trustee Co of Australia (1960) 104 CLR 346, foll. Re Schmidt; Ex parte Angelwood Pty Ltd (1967) 13 FLR 111, cited Re Phyllis Graves; Ex parte Phyllis Graves v Kevin Seggie [1997] FCA 1154, foll. Re Bruce William Naghten and Irene Margaret Naghten; Bruce William Naghten and Irene Margaret Naghten v Commonwealth Bank of Australia [1998] FCA 635, foll.
LANCE MELBOURNE v RELATIVITY PTY LTD and MARK HENRY DE COURCY BINGHAM NG 7250 OF 1998 MOORE J 26 FEBRUARY 1999 SYDNEY
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY NG 7250 OF 1998
BETWEEN: LANCE MELBOURNE
Applicant
AND: RELATIVITY PTY LTD
First Respondent
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate