Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Anema E Core Pty Ltd v Aromas Pty Ltd [1999] FCA 215
ANEMA E CORE PTY LTD V AROMAS PTY LTD QG 203 OF 1996 SPENDER J 12 MARCH 1999
BRISBANE
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
QUEENSLAND DISTRICT REGISTRY QG 203 of 1996
BETWEEN: ANEMA E CORE PTY LTD
First Applicant
MICHELE ALROE
Second Applicant
DAMIEN JOHN ALROE
Third Applicant
AND: AROMAS PTY LTD
First Respondent
AROMAS FRANCHISING PTY LTD
Second Respondent
CHRISTOPHER JOHN BRYANT
Third Respondent
ROBYN LESLEY HORLEY
Fourth Respondent
EMMA HOSSACK
Fifth Respondent
MARISE MCGRORY
Sixth Respondent
JUDGE: SPENDER J
DATE OF ORDER: 12 MARCH 1999
WHERE MADE: BRISBANE
THE COURT ORDERS:
1. Notwithstanding the provisions of O 62 r 36A, the first and second respondent pay one-half of the costs of the applicants of and incidental to the action to be taxed; 2. The applicants pay the costs of the second respondent on the cross-claim, to be taxed; 3 As between the applicants and the third to sixth respondents there be no order as to costs. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
QUEENSLAND DISTRICT REGISTRY QG 203 of 1996
BETWEEN: ANEMA E CORE PTY LTD
First Applicant
MICHELE ALROE
Second Applicant
DAMIEN JOHN ALROE
Third Applicant
AND: AROMAS PTY LTD
First Respondent
AROMAS FRANCHISING PTY LTD
Second Respondent
CHRISTOPHER JOHN BRYANT
Third Respondent
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate