Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Mann v State Rail Authority [1999] FCA 273 INDUSTRIAL LAW - termination of employment - proceedings in the Australian Industrial Relations Commission seeking relief against termination of employment pursuant to s 170CE of the Workplace Relations Act 1996 (Cth) - whether applicant's right to bring an application to the Commission was excluded by the combined operation of s 170CC of the Act and reg 30B(1)(c) of the Workplace Relations Regulations (Cth) - whether maximum period of probation of twelve months was reasonable - application for writs of certiorari and mandamus against a Full Bench of the Commission - whether there was a constructive failure of the part of the Commission to exercise its jurisdiction.
Workplace Relations Act 1996 (Cth)s 170CC Workplace Relations Regulations (Cth) reg 30B Transport Administration (Staff) Regulations 1995 (NSW) cl 8
Potter v Australian Capital Territory (No 2) (1997) 74 IR 403 referred to Rose v Department of Social Security (1990) 21 FCR 241 applied Nimmo v Alexander Cowan & Sons [1968] AC 107 referred to Vines v Djordjevitch (1955) 91 CLR 512 referred to
RHETT KARL MANN v VICE PRESIDENT ROSS, DEPUTY PRESIDENT DUNCAN, COMMISSIONER LARKIN SITTING AS THE FULL BENCH OF THE AUSTRALIAN INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION, PRESIDENT JUSTICE GIUDICE IN HIS CAPACITY AS A PRINCIPAL MEMBER OF THE AUSTRALIAN INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION, STATE RAIL AUTHORITY
NG 807 OF 1998
RYAN, MOORE AND MARSHALL JJ
24 MARCH 1999
SYDNEY
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY NG 807 OF 1998
ON APPEAL FROM A JUDGE OF THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BETWEEN: RHETT KARL MANN
Applicant
AND: VICE PRESIDENT ROSS, DEPUTY PRESIDENT DUNCAN,
COMMISSIONER LARKIN
SITTING AS THE FULL BENCH OF THE AUSTRALIAN
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate