Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
May v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation [1999] FCA 287
ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – natural justice – alleged obligation to notify of decision – scope of requirement of procedural fairness – relationship of procedural fairness to the failure to have regard to a relevant consideration ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – taxation – judicial review of administrative decision by Deputy Commissioner of Taxation – exercise of powers to require any person to provide information and to attend and give evidence under s 264(1) of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (Cth) – reasons statements – whether purpose expressed in reasons statement is sufficient to justify the scope of information sought
TAXATION – notice to provide information relating to documents under s 264(1)(a) of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (Cth) – interpretation of s 264(1)(a) of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (Cth) in light of s 264(1)(b) of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (Cth) that deals with the production of documents Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (Cth) s 264(1) Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977 (Cth) s 5, s 11, s 13(1) Taxation Administration Act 1953 (Cth) Part III, Division 2 Annetts v McCann (1990) 170 CLR 596 applied Kioa v West (1985) 159 CLR 550 applied Sixth Ravini Pty Ltd v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1985) 6 FCR 356 referred to Eighth Oupan Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation (1986) 10 FCR 559 referred to Allen, Allen & Hemsley v Deputy Federal Commissioner of Taxation 88 ATC 4734 referred to Minosea Pty Ltd v ASC (1994) 14 ACSR 642 referred to Industrial Equity Ltd v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation (1990) 170 CLR 649 considered Federal Commissioner of Taxation v Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Ltd (1979) 143 CLR 499 applied Smorgon v Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Ltd (1976) 134 CLR 475 referred to Commissioner of Taxation v Citibank Ltd (1989) 20 FCR 403 referred to Fieldhouse v Commissioner of Taxation (1989) 25 FCR 187 referred to Minister for Aboriginal Affairs v Peko-Wallsend Ltd (1986) 162 CLR 24 referred to Australian Broadcasting Tribunal v Bond (1990) 170 CLR 321 referred to Public Service Board of New South Wales v Osmond (1986) 159 CLR 656 referred to Worthley v Australian Securities Commission (1993) 42 FCR 578 referred to Scott v Handley [1999] FCA 404 referred to Hughes Aircraft Systems International v Airservices Australia (1997) 76 FCR 151 referred to Marcel v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis [1992] Ch 225 referred to Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Wu Shan Liang (1996) 185 CLR 259 applied Vatcher v Paull [1915] AC 372 referred to Geosam Investments Pty Ltd v Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Ltd (1979) 25 ALR 445 considered House v R (1936) 55 CLR 499 referred to
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate