Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA Gordonstone Coal Management Pty Ltd v Australian Industrial Relations Commission [1999] FCA 298 INDUSTRIAL LAW – matter remitted by High Court – application for order nisi for writs of certorari and prohibition – whether certification of an agreement under the Industrial Relations Act 1988 was sustained by an industrial situation or an industrial dispute which had an interstate element – whether the dispute resolution procedures in the agreement were invalid as they were concerned with the determination of local disputes – whether an assumption of jurisdiction by the Commission under the dispute resolution procedures would be subject to and restricted by s 89A of the Workplace Relations Act 1996
Industrial Relations Act 1988 (Cth): s 4(1), s 170MA(1), s 170MC, s 170MH Div 2 Pt VIB Workplace Relations Act 1996 (Cth): s 99, s 89A, s 107 Div 4 Pt VIB Workplace Relations and Other Legislation Amendment Act 1996 (Cth): Item 23 of Sch 8 Sch 5
Attorney‑General for Queensland v Riordan (1997) 146 ALR 445 cited The Queen v Commonwealth Conciliation and Arbitration Commission; Ex parte Melbourne Metropolitan Tramways Board (1965) 113 CLR 228 cited The Queen v Portus; Ex parte City of Perth (1973) 129 CLR 312 cited The Queen v Hegarty; Ex parte The Corporation of the City of Salisbury (1981) 147 CLR 617 considered GORDONSTONE COAL MANAGEMENT PTY LTD v AUSTRALIAN INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION & ANOR VG 200 of 1998 BLACK CJ, HEEREY & GOLDBERG JJ MELBOURNE
25 MARCH 1999 IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY VG 200 of 1998
BETWEEN: GORDONSTONE COAL MANAGEMENT PTY LTD
Applicant
AND: AUSTRALIAN INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION
First Respondent
CONSTRUCTION, FORESTRY, MINING AND ENERGY UNION
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate