Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Flocast Australia Pty Ltd v Purcell [1999] FCA 309 PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – documents and other materials seized under Anton Piller Order – substantive judgment for applicant – later complaint by respondent that materials not covered by the order were taken – whether jurisdiction to award damages pursuant to applicant's undertaking Air Express Limited v Ansett Transport Industries (Operations) Pty Ltd (1980-81) 146 CLR 249 applied Columbia Picture Industries Inc v Robinson [1987] Ch 38 followed J C Techforce Pty Ltd v Pearce (1996) 138 ALR 522 cited Uren v John Fairfax & Sons Pty Ltd (1966) 117 CLR 118 cited Everet v Williams (1725), discussed in (1893) 9 LQR 197 mentioned
FLOCAST AUSTRALIA PTY LTD v PURCELL & ORS (NO. 2) NO. VG 379 of 1994 HEEREY J 31 MARCH 1999 MELBOURNE IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY VG 379 of 1994
BETWEEN: FLOCAST AUSTRALIA PTY LTD
Applicant
AND: JAMES DESMOND PURCELL, JODY MARC, TRACEY LEE HOOK and TIGER BRONZE PTY LTD
Respondents
JUDGE: HEEREY J
DATE OF ORDER: 31 MARCH 1999
WHERE MADE: MELBOURNE
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. The respondents' notice of motion will be adjourned for further hearing on a date to be fixed. 2. The applicant is to file and serve affidavits on or before 3 May 1999. 3. The respondents are to file and serve affidavits in reply (if any) by 17 May 1999. 4. The applicant is to pay the respondents' costs of the hearing on 1 March 1999, such costs to be taxed and paid forthwith. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules. IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY VG 379 of 1994
BETWEEN: FLOCAST AUSTRALIA PTY LTD
Applicant
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate