Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Cash Resources Australia Pty Ltd v De Vries [1999] FCA 311 BANKRUPTCY - creditor's petition - whether "other sufficient cause" why sequestration order ought not be made - whether claim by debtors against petitioning creditor sufficient to be counter-balanced against judgment debt or whether claim likely to produce in a short time sufficient funds to relieve the debtors from the present state of insolvency. Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) s 52(2)(b) Ling v Enrobook Pty Ltd (1997) 74 FCR 19 (FC) applied Re Schmidt; Ex parte Anglewood Pty Ltd (1968) 13 FLR 111 cited
IN THE MATTER OF KOOS JOHN DE VRIES, VICKI LOUISE DE VRIES AND RENSKE DE VRIES; CASH RESOURCES AUSTRALIA PTY LTD v KOOS JOHN DE VRIES, VICKI LOUSIE DE VRIES AND RENSKE DE VRIES QG7279 OF 1998 COOPER J BRISBANE 26 MARCH 1999
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
QUEENSLAND DISTRICT REGISTRY QG7279 OF 1998
IN THE MATTER OF: KOOS JOHN DE VRIES, VICKI LOUISE DE VRIES AND RENSKE DE VRIES
CASH RESOURCES AUSTRALIA PTY LTD ACN 004 792 330
Applicant
AND: KOOS JOHN DE VRIES, VICKI LOUISE DE VRIES AND RENSKE DE VRIES
Respondents
JUDGE: COOPER J
DATE OF ORDER: 26 MARCH 1999
WHERE MADE: BRISBANE
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. In accordance with s 43 of the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) the estates of Koos John De Vries, Vicki Louise De Vries and Renske De Vries are sequestrated. 2. The petitioning creditor be paid its costs of and incidental to the petition including reserved costs, if any, such costs to be taxed if not agreed and paid out of the bankrupts' estate in accordance with s 109(1)(a) of the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth). Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate