Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Barrington v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [1999] FCA 327 IMMIGRATION – Refugee Review Tribunal – what constitutes compliance with the requirement to make a finding on material facts and give reasons – whether ambiguity in Tribunal reasons should be given a beneficial construction – whether certain "treatment" by the police in Sri Lanka constituted persecution
Migration Act 1958, s 430(1) Muralidharan v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (1996) 62 FCR 402 cited Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Wu Shan Liang (1996) 185 CLR 271-272 referred to Collector of Customs v Pozzolanic Enterprises Pty Ltd (1993) 43 FCR 280 cited Khan v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (Gummow J, 11 December 1987, unreported) cited Turner v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (1981) 35 ALR 388 cited
JOHAN FREDERICK RUDOLPH BARRINGTON v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS NG 1401 of 1998 HILL J 29 MARCH 1999
SYDNEY IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY NG 1401 OF 1998
BETWEEN: JOHAN FREDERICK RUDOLPH BARRINGTON
Applicant
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND
MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS
Respondent
JUDGE: HILL J
DATE OF ORDER: 29 MARCH 1999
WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. The Application be dismissed. 2. The Applicant pay the Respondent's costs. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules. IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY NG 1401 OF 1998
BETWEEN: JOHAN FREDERICK RUDOLPH BARRINGTON
Applicant
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND
MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS
Respondent
JUDGE: HILL J
DATE: 29 MARCH 1999
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate