Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Armidale City Council v Alec Finlayson Pty Ltd [1999] FCA 330 Negligence – duty of care – breach of duty – damages – pure economic loss – loss of profits – remediation costs – council negligent in approving development applications – contaminated land re-zoned for residential purposes – whether a statement of environmental effects by a consulting valuer and registered surveyor negated the existence of the council's duty of care – whether the council's duty of care was limited to making a determination under s 90 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (NSW) – whether a private cause of action in negligence was negated by the statutory rights of appeal under the EPA Act – whether the harm to the respondent's reputation was caused by public misapprehension or misleading or unfair media publicity rather than the council's negligence – whether the trial judge quantified a loss of profits claim rather than the loss of opportunity to earn profit – whether the trial judge allowed for the chance that the NSW Environment Protection Authority may not have required stringent remedial measures – whether the award of damages for remediation costs should have been discounted on the basis of that chance.
Environmental Planning Assessment Act 1979 (NSW) – ss 90(1), 77(3), 76(2)
Environmentally Hazardous Chemicals Act 1985 (NSW) – s 35 Contaminated Land Management Act 1997 (NSW) – s 21 Sutherland Shire Council v Heyman (1985) 157 CLR 424 – cons. Avenhouse v Hornsby Shire Council ((1998) 44 NSWLR 1 – cons. Donoghue v Stevenson [1932] AC 562 – cons. Pyrenees Shire Council v Day (1998) 192 CLR 330 – cons. Romeo v Conservation Commission (NT) (1998) 192 CLR 431 – cons. Hawkins v Clayton (1988) 164 CLR 539 – cited Albert Shire Council v Bamford (1998) 97 LGERA 33 – cited Mahmud v Bank of Credit and Commerce International SA [1998] AC 20 – cited Bryan v Maloney (1995) 182 CLR 609 – cited Sellars v Adelaide Petroleum NL (1994) 179 CLR 332 – cited Malec v J C Hutton Pty Ltd (1990) 169 CLR 638 – cited March v E and M H Stramare (1991) 171 CLR 506 – cited
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate