Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Fox v Commissioner for Superannuation [1999] FCA 372 JUDGMENTS – Failure of both parties to draw the Court's attention to a critical statutory provision – Reopening of appeal – Whether the Full Federal Court should set aside its earlier judgment under Federal Court Rules, O 35 r 7, the slip rule SUPERANNUATION – Whether applicant's entitlement to a pension under s 60N Superannuation Act 1922 (Cth) should be calculated by reference to contributions paid or contributions liable to be paid – Combined operation of Superannuation Act 1922 (Cth) ss 48B & 60N – Meaning of "salary" – Whether a dependant's allowance falls within the concept of "salary" Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975, (Cth) s 44(1) Superannuation Act 1922 (Cth), ss 4, 12, 13, 16, 22, 48B & Part IVA (ss 60A-60T) Superannuation Act 1942 (Cth), ss 6, 18 Acts Interpretation Act 1901 (Cth), s 15AA(1) Defence Act 1903 (Cth), ss 30, 31, 33, 45, 49, 117, 124 Defence Act (No 3) 1939 (Cth) Superannuation Act 1924 (Cth), s 16 Australian Military Regulations 1927, reg 109 Military Financial Regulations 1935, regs 17-43A War Financial (Military Forces) Regulations 1942, regs 4, 7, 8, 9, 10, 34, 36 Federal Court Rules,O 35, r 7 Fox v Commissioner of Superannuation (1997) 78 FCR 151, considered. University of Newcastle v Chopra (1989) 63 ALJR 397, cited. CIC Insurance Ltd v Bankstown Football Club Ltd (1995-7) 187 CLR 384, followed. Waugh v Kippen (1986) 160 CLR 156, cited. Newcastle City Council v GIO General Ltd (1997) 191 CLR 85, cited. Saraswati v The Queen (1991) 172 CLR 1, cited. Cooper Brookes (Wollongong) Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation (1981) 147 CLR 297, cited. MBF v Pullinger (1990) 95 ALR 463, cited. Hilton v Commissioner of Taxation (1992) 38 FCR 170, cited. Chun Wang v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs, unreported, 13 February 1997, Merkel J, cited. Autodesk Inc v Dyason [No 2] (1993) 175 CLR 300, cited. Commissioner of Superannuation v Carpenter (1983) 48 ALR 230, cited. L Shaddock & Associates Pty Ltd v Council of the City of Parramatta [No 2] (1983) 151 CLR 590, cited. Wykes v Samilk Pty Ltd [No 2] NSWCA, unreported, 18 August 1998, cited.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate