Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Coffey v Secretary, Department of Social Security [1999] FCA 375 SOCIAL SECURITY – Job search allowance – Alleged overpayment – Benefits withheld in order to recover overpayment – prosecution for fraud commenced against recipient – Review of decision to withhold benefits pursuant to review process in Social Security Act 1991 (Cth) – Decision upheld on internal review, on review by Social Security Appeals Tribunal and on review by Administrative Appeals Tribunal – Application to Court to recover amount withheld as a debt, and claiming malicious prosecution and misfeasance in public office – Whether Court has jurisdiction – Whether matter "arises under a Federal law" within s 39B(1A)(c) Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) – Whether action an abuse of process – Whether collateral attack of reviewable decisions under Social Security Act available. Social Security Act 1991 (Cth) ss 559, 1068, 1224, 1347 Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) s 39B(1A)(c) Federal Court Rules O 20 r 2 Martin v Watson [1996] AC 74 cited Commonwealth Life Assurance Society Ltd v Brain (1935) 53 CLR 343 cited Northern Territory v Mengel (1995) 185 CLR 307 applied Sanders v Snell (1998) 157 ALR 491 cited Re McJannett; Ex parte Australian Workers' Union of Employees (Q) [No 2] (1997) 189 CLR 654 applied Federal Airports Corporation v Aerolineas Argentinas (1997) 76 FCR 582 considered Sea Culture International v Scoles (1991) 32 FCR 275 applied Walton v Gardiner (1993) 177 CLR 378 applied
PETER MICHAEL COFFEY v SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SECURITY SG 119 OF 1998 von DOUSSA, BRANSON and SUNDBERG JJ 7 APRIL 1999 ADELAIDE
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
SOUTH AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY SG 119 OF 1998
BETWEEN: PETER MICHAEL COFFEY
Appellant
AND: SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SECURITY
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate