Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Shields v Carlton & United Breweries (NSW) Pty Ltd [1999] FCA 377 INDUSTRIAL LAW – termination of employment for alleged misconduct – relevance of evidence of employer's condonation of similar acts of misconduct in the past – whether setting aside of findings of fact at first instance questioned on appeal entails conclusion that no valid reason existed – employee's opportunity to respond to allegations – whether extends to opportunity to raise extenuating circumstances or other mitigating factors. Industrial Relations Act 1988 (Cth)ss170DC and 170DE.
Perrin v Des Taylor Pty Ltd (1995) 58 IR 254, applied. Walton v Mermaid Dry Cleaners Pty Ltd (1996) 142 ALR 681, referred to. Aitken v Construction, Mining, Energy, Timberyards, Sawmills & Woodworkers Union of Australia (WA Branch) (1995) 63 IR 1, applied. Burazin v Blacktown City Guardian Pty Ltd (1996) 142 ALR 144, applied.
ERIC SHIELDS v CARLTON & UNITED BREWERIES (NSW) PTY LIMITED NG 1108 OF 1998
RYAN, MOORE AND MARSHALL JJ
8 APRIL 1999 SYDNEY
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY NG 1108 OF 1998
ON APPEAL FROM A JUDGE OF THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BETWEEN: ERIC SHIELDS
Appellant
AND: CARLTON AND UNITED BREWERIES (NSW) PTY LIMITED
Respondent
JUDGES: RYAN, MOORE AND MARSHALL JJ
DATE OF ORDER: 8 APRIL 1999
WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. That much of the order of Wilcox J of 13 October 1998 dismissing the application by Eric Clarence Shields under s170EA of the Industrial Relations Act 1988 (Cth) be set aside. 2. The respondent pay the appellant the sum of $931.25 by way of compensation within 21 days of the date of this order. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate