Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Adam v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs
[1999] FCA 387 IMMIGRATION – Refugees – Refugee Review Tribunal – Refusal of application for protection visa – Whether Tribunal failed to speculate – Whether Tribunal obliged to make inquiries of those who write letters supporting applicant's case – Whether Tribunal failed to look into future – Whether illogicality in Tribunal's reasoning a ground of review – Whether Tribunal merely pretended to apply real chance test. Migration Act 1958 s 420(2)(b) The Minister v Wu Shan Liang (1996) 185 CLR 259 cited Guo v The Minister (1996) 64 FCR 151 mentioned The Minister v Guo (1997) 191 CLR 559 applied Trevanathan v The Minister (unreported, 24 December 1997) applied Zuway v The Minister (unreported, 31 December 1998) applied Emiantor v The Minister (1997) 48 ALD 635 mentioned Singh v The Minister (1997) 144 ALR 284 mentioned Mok v The Minister (1993) 47 FCR 1 mentioned The Minister v Epeabaka (unreported, 6 January 1999) applied Roads Corporation v Ducakis [1995] 2 VR 508 applied Australian Broadcasting Tribunal v Bond (1990) 170 CLR 321 applied
FATH ELRAHMAN MOHAMED ADAM v THE MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS
VG 660 OF 1998 SUNDBERG J 8 APRIL 1999 MELBOURNE
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY VG 660 OF 1998
BETWEEN: FATH ELRAHMAN MOHAMED ADAM
Applicant
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS
Respondent
JUDGE: SUNDBERG J
DATE OF ORDER: 8 APRIL 1999
WHERE MADE: MELBOURNE
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. The application be dismissed. 2. The applicant pay the respondent's costs of the application. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate