Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA Burg Design Pty Ltd v Wolki [1999] FCA 388 TRADE PRACTICES ACT, s 52 ) FAIR TRADING ACT, s 42 ) - sale of business – representations made orally and by financial statements – failure to make correction when previously made representations were falsified – reliance – inference from nature of representations and fact of ensuing agreement – discussion of checking by representee as not denying reliance – contractual acknowledgment that representations not relied on – effect - contract with exclusion clause signed because representation was believed. EVIDENCE – without prejudice privilege – no offer made – waiver. Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth), s 52 Evidence Act 1995 (Cth), s 131(2) Fair Trading Act 1987 (NSW), s 42 Martin v Osborne (1936) 55 CLR 367 referred to Gould v Vaggelas (1985) 157 CLR 215 applied San Sebastian Proprietary Limited v Minister Administering the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (1986) 162 CLR 340 referred to Dominelli Ford (Hurstville) Pty Ltd v Karmot Auto Spares Pty Ltd (1992) 110 ALR 535 applied Commission for the New Towns v Cooper (Great Britain) Ltd [1995] Ch 259 applied Como Investments Pty Ltd (in liquidation) v Yenald Nominees Pty Ltd (1997) ATPR 43,617 applied Sibley v Grosvenor (1916) 21 CLR 469 applied Krakowski v Eurolynx Properties Limited (1995) 183 CLR 563 applied Menmel Pty Limited v The Great Australian Bite Pty Limited (1997) ATPR 43,639 applied Bowler v Hilda Pty Ltd (1998) 80 FCR 191 applied Tantipech v IOOF Australia Trustees (NSW) Limited (1998) ATPR 40,730 applied I00F Australia Trustees (NSW) Ltd v Tantipech (1998) 156 ALR 470 applied GIO Australia Holdings Limited v Marks (1997) ATPR 43,541 applied Lezam Pty Ltd v Seabridge Australia Pty Ltd (1992) 35 FCR 535 applied Ritchie v Woollett (Santow J, Supreme Court of New South Wales, 25 September 1996) applied Greenhalgh v Composite Buyers Limited (Davies, Einfeld and Sackville JJ, unreported, 31 May 1995) applied Leda Holdings Pty Ltd v Oraka Pty Ltd (1998) ATPR 40,501 referred to Hanave Pty Ltd v LFOT Pty Ltd [1999] FCA 357 applied Kizbeau Pty Limited v W G & B Pty Limited (1995) 184 CLR 281 applied The Great Australian Bite Pty Ltd v Menmel Pty Limited (1996) ATPR 42,322 applied Smith New Court Securities Ltd v Citibank NA [1997] AC 254 referred to Marks v GIO Australia Holdings Ltd (1998) 158 ALR 333 referred to
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate