Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Ahmed v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [1999] FCA 430
Migration – judicial review – whether the Tribunal was satisfied that the applicant was making or was subject to acceptable arrangements to depart Australia. Migration Act 1958 – ss 116(1)(b), 116(1)(f), 189, 476(1)(e) Migration Regulations 1994 – Schedule 1, 050.212
SALMAN AHMED aka ALI HASSAN v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS N 205 OF 1999 JUDGE: BEAUMONT J. DATE: 1 APRIL 1999 PLACE: SYDNEY
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY N 205 OF 1999
BETWEEN: SALMAN AHMED aka ALI HASSAN
Applicant
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS
Respondent
JUDGE: BEAUMONT J.
DATE OF ORDER: 1 APRIL 1999
WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. The application be dismissed with costs. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY N 205 OF 1999
BETWEEN: SALMAN AHMED aka ALI HASSAN
Applicant
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS
Respondent
JUDGE: BEAUMONT J.
DATE: 1 APRIL 1999
PLACE: SYDNEY
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
BEAUMONT J: 1 This is an application by an applicant in person in a migration matter. The history of the issues that are now before the Court are recounted in the affidavit of Mr Peek. They are relevantly as follows: · The applicant arrived in Australia on 26 December 1997 on a South African passport issued in the name Ali Hassan, to whom a visitor's visa had been issued. He was detained under s 189 of the Migration Act 1958 ("the Act") on 13 February 1998 after he was found to be working in contravention of the conditions of the visitor's visa, which was cancelled under ss 116(1)(b) and (f) of the Act on 17 February 1998. · The applicant applied for a protection visa on 26 February 1998, which was refused on 31 March 1998. This decision was affirmed by the Refugee Review Tribunal ("the Tribunal") on 20 May 1998. An application to this Court for review of that decision was dismissed on 30 October 1998. · The applicant has made numerous applications to the respondent for a bridging visa. All applications were refused. Most of these decisions were challenged in the Tribunal, which affirmed them.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate