Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Second Lenbourne Pty Ltd v Beagle Management Pty Ltd [1999] FCA 486 PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – applications for security for costs – applicant trustee – s1335 Corporations Law - whether "credible testimony" before the Court that there is reason to believe the applicants will be unable to pay the respondents' costs if the respondents are successful - whether Court should exercise its discretion in favour of order for security – failure or refusal of applicants to adduce evidence of financial accounts - whether rule in Jones v Dunkel applies. Corporations Law: s 1335 Warren Mitchell Pty Ltd v Australian Maritime Officers' Union (1993) 12 ACSR 1 – applied Jones v Dunkel (1959) 101 CLR 298 - considered Tipperary Developments Pty Ltd v State of Western Australia (1996) 22 ACSR 241 -applied Appleglen Pty Ltd v Mainzeal Corporation Pty Ltd (1988) 79 ALR 634 - considered Crypta Fuels Pty Ltd v Svelte Corporation Pty Ltd (1995) 19 ACSR 68 - applied Armstrong White Killham (Managing Agents) Pty Ltd v Insurance Exchange Group of Australia (unreported, Supreme Court of Victoria, Byrne J, 31 October 1997) - distinguished
SECOND LENBOURNE PTY LTD & ORS v BEAGLE MANAGEMENT PTY LTD & ORS VG 299 of 1998 GOLDBERG J 21 APRIL 1999 MELBOURNE
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY VG 299 of 1998
BETWEEN: SECOND LENBOURNE PTY LTD
(ACN 005 988 483)
First Applicant
TARGRIDGE PTY LTD
(ACN 006 751 220)
Second Applicant
AND: BEAGLE MANAGEMENT PTY LTD
(ACN 009 280 791)
First Respondent
B M LIMITED
(ACN 009 362 350)
Second Respondent
BEAGLE HOLDINGS PTY LIMITED
(ACN 009 280 782)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate