Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Caterpillar Inc v John Deere Ltd [1999] FCA 517 INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY – patents – patent for belted tractors – infringement action – application for leave to serve out of the jurisdiction parent company of Australian respondent – whether prima facie case of liability as joint tortfeasor or for authorisation – discretion to grant leave – postponement of issues against joined respondent Patents Act 1990 (Cth) s 13(1) Federal Court Rules O 8 r 2(2)(c) Federal Court Practice Note 14
Sydbank Soenderjylland A/S v Bannerton Holdings Pty Ltd (1996) 68 FCR 539 applied Intel Corporation v General Instrument Corporation (No.2) [1991] RPC 235 applied Lonrho Ltd v Shell Petroleum Co Ltd [1980] 1 WLR 672 cited Walker v Alemite Corporation (1933) 49 CLR 643 applied
Belegging-en Exploitatiemaatschappij Lavender BV v Witten Industrial Diamonds Ltd [1979] FSR 59 cited Best v Acquagas Marketing Pty Ltd (1988) 83 ALR 217 followed Sartas No. 1 Pty Ltd v Koukurou & Partners (1994) 30 IPR 479 cited Rescare Ltd v Anaesthetic Supplies Pty Ltd (1992) 111 ALR 205 cited Advanced Building Systems Pty Ltd v Ramset Fasteners Aust Pty Ltd (1995) ARPC 91-129 cited Bristol-Myers Squibb Co v F H Faulding & Co Pty Ltd (1998) 41 IPR 467 cited The Electric Furnace Co v Selas Corporation [1987] RPC 23 at 33 disapproved
CATERPILLAR INC. v JOHN DEERE LIMITED & ORS NO. VG 739 of 1997 HEEREY J 28 APRIL 1999 MELBOURNE
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY VG 739 of 1997
BETWEEN: CATERPILLAR INC.
Applicant
AND: JOHN DEERE LIMITED
First Respondent
QAS WHOLESALERS PTY LTD
Second Respondent
AGRO MACHINERY PTY LTD
Third Respondent
JUDGE: HEEREY J
DATE OF ORDER: 28 APRIL 1999
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate