Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Steven David Martin v Tasmania Development and Resources
[1999] FCA 593 CONTRACTS – breach of contract – contract of employment for three year term – term allowing termination on one month's notice based on the "operational requirements" of employer – term imposing obligation on parties to seek to avert or minimise termination – termination of employee with payment purportedly in lieu of notice – no consultation –whether termination breached contractual terms DAMAGES – breach of contract of employment – availability of aggravated or exemplary damages - assessment of compensatory damages – allowance for effect of taxation on elegible termination payment – allowance for loss of chance of renewal of contract TRADE AND COMMERCE – misleading and deceptive conduct – whether notice of termination contained misleading or deceptive representations by referring to "operational requirements" which did not exist – whether such conduct was "in trade or commerce" TORT – misfeasance in public office – whether officer of respondent acted with intention to cause harm or knowingly in excess of power WORDS AND PHRASES – "operational requirements", "notice", "in trade or commerce" Tasmanian Development Act 1983 (Tas) ss 4, 5(3)(b), 6, 15A Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) s 52 Industrial Relations Act 1988 (Cth) s 170DE Income Tax Assessment Act (1936) (Cth) Part III Div 2 Subdiv AA Delaney v Staples [1992] 1 AC 687 applied Sanders v Snell (1998) 157 ALR 491 applied
Boston Deep Sea Fishing Co v Ansell (1888) 39 ChD 339 cited
Nettlefold v Kym Smoker Pty Ltd (1996) 69 IR 370 referred to
Woods v W M Car Services (Peterborough) Ltd [1982] ICR 693 cited
Cosco Holdings Pty Ltd v Do (1997) 150 ALR 127 cited Ridge v Baldwin [1964] AC 40 applied Coutts v Commonwealth (1985) 157 CLR 91 applied Byrne v Australian Airlines Ltd (1995) 185 CLR 410 applied Concrete Constructions (NSW) Pty Ltd v Nelson (1990) 169 CLR 594 applied Barto v GPR Management Services Pty Ltd (1991) 105 ALR 339 not followed Patrick v Steel Mains Pty Ltd (1987) 77 ALR 133 not followed Wright v TNT Australia Pty Ltd (1988) 80 ALR 221 not followed Orison Pty Ltd v Strategic Minerals Corp NL (1987) 77 ALR 141 not followed Finucane v NSW Egg Corp (1988) 80 ALR 486 not followed Merman Pty Ltd v Cockburn Cement Pty Ltd (1988) 84 ALR 521 not followed Burgundy Royale Investments Pty Ltd v Westpac Banking Corporation (1987) 18 FCR 212 applied Northern Territory v Mengel (1995) 185 CLR 307 applied Addis v Gramophone Co Ltd [1909] AC 488 applied Watts v Rake (1960) 108 CLR 158 cited Patterson v Middle Harbour Yacht Club (1996) 64 FCR 405 followed Commonwealth v Amann Aviation Pty Ltd (1991) 174 CLR 64applied Lavarack v Woods of Colchester Ltd [1967] 1 QB 278 cited Hadley v Baxendale (1854) 9 Exch 341 applied New South Wales Cancer Council v Sarfaty (1992) 28 NSWLR 68 not followed
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate