Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NMFM Property Pty Ltd v Citibank Ltd (No 9) [1999] FCA 638
PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – subpoena to non-party in Melbourne to produce documents in Sydney – third party's claim of lawyer-client privilege – as a result of "guideline" reasons for judgment, claim of lawyer-client privilege no longer pressed – appropriate order for costs.
Fuelxpress Ltd v L M Ericsson Pty Ltd (1987) 75 ALR 284
Hadid v Lenfest Communications Inc (1997) 144 ALR 73
Deposit & Investment Co Ltd (Receivers Appointed) v Peat Marwick Mitchell & Co (1996) 39 NSWLR 267
Australian Securities Commission v Aust-Home Investments Ltd (1993) 44 FCR 194
Gribbles v Health Insurance Commission (1997) 80 FCR 284
`
NMFM PROPERTY PTY LIMITED (formerly called "National Mutual Property Services (Australia) Pty Ltd") v CITIBANK LIMITED (formerly called "Citibank Savings Limited")
NG 765 of 1994
LINDGREN J
7 MAY 1999
SYDNEY
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY NG 765 OF 1994
BETWEEN: NMFM PROPERTY PTY LIMITED (formerly called "National Mutual Property Services (Australia) Pty Ltd")
First Applicant
NATIONAL MUTUAL ASSETS MANAGEMENT LIMITED
Second Applicant
THE NATIONAL MUTUAL LIFE ASSOCIATION OF AUSTRALASIA LIMITED
Third Applicant
AND: CITIBANK LIMITED (formerly called "Citibank Savings Limited")
Respondent
FIRST CROSS-CLAIM
CITIBANK LIMITED (formerly called "Citibank Savings Limited")
Cross-Claimant
[Lance Kelly Financial Management Pty Ltd, removed as a party]
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate