Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Compagnie Industrielle de Precontrainte et D'Equipment des Constructions SA v First Melbourne Securities Pty Ltd
[1999] FCA 660
COPYRIGHT – Infringement – engineering drawings of expansion joints – whether respondents infringed copyright in engineering drawings in developing and producing expansion joints – whether sufficient similarity between copyright drawings and drawings and joints of the respondents – relevance of finding of actual copying – whether copyright drawings constitute a 'corresponding design' – whether the copyright drawings can be 'judged by the eye' – whether copyright drawings that contain data enabling manufacture of the article depicted constitute a 'method or principle of construction'
WORDS & PHRASES - "design" - "method or principle of construction" - "judged by the eye"
Copyright Act 1968 (Cth) ss 14(1), 21(3), 31(1)(b)(i), 36(1) and 77 Designs Act 1906 (Cth) s 4(1) Amalgamated Mining Services Pty Ltd v Warman International Ltd (1992) 24 IPR 461, considered SW Hart & Co Pty Ltd v Edwards Hot Water Systems (1985) 159 CLR 466, applied Edwards Hot Water Systems v SW Hart [1983] 1 IPR 228, considered SW Hart & Co Pty Ltd v Edwards Hot Water Systems (1982) AIPC 90-017, cited Henley Arch Pty Ltd v Clarendon Homes (Aust) Pty Ltd (1998) 41 IPR 443, applied Eagle Homes Pty Ltd v Austec Homes Pty Ltd (1999) 161 ALR 503, applied Hosokawa Micron International Inc v Fortune (1990) 26 FCR 393, cited Shacklady v Atkins (1994) 30 IPR 387, cited Dart Industries v Décor Corp Pty Ltd (1989) 15 IPR 403, applied Interlego AG v Croner Trading Pty Ltd (1992) 39 FCR 348, applied AMP Inc v Utiliux Pty Ltd [1972] RPC 103, considered Interlego AG v Croner Trading (1991) 21 IPR 373, applied Firmagroup Australia Pty Ltd v Byrne & Davidson Doors (Vic) Pty Ltd (1987) 180 CLR 483, considered COMPAGNIE INDUSTRIELLE DE PRECONTRAINTE ET D'EQUIPMENT DES CONSTRUCTIONS SA v FIRST MELBOURNE SECURITIES PTY LTD VG 110 OF 1995 JUDGE: MERKEL J DATE: 20 MAY 1999 PLACE: MELBOURNE
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate