Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Hughes v Holbrook [1999] FCA 665 BANKRUPTCY – sequestration order - creditors special resolution requiring execution of deed of arrangement - whether sufficient cause for non-execution - debtors allege that proposal put forward without their authority - debtors allege that terms of deed unable to be complied with - whether controlling trustee has standing to make application - trustee's remuneration - whether discretion should be exercised in any event Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth)Part X, ss 188, 189A, 204, 216, 221(1)(b), 236(1)(b), 257 Vaccaro v Mann (1991) 30 FCR 214 Re Morris; Ex parte Kelly (1939) 11 ABC 152 Sandell v Porter (1966) 115 CLR 666
DEREK HUGHES and SANDRA ANNE HUGHES v KIM DAVID HOLBROOK
WG 7138 of 1998
WG 7139 of 1998
BOON JR
20 MAY 1999
PERTH IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA WG 7138 of 1998
WESTERN AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY WG 7139 of 1998
BETWEEN: DEREK HUGHES and SANDRA ANNE HUGHES
Applicants (Respondents)
AND: KIM DAVID HOLBROOK
Respondent (Applicant)
JUDGE: BOON JR
DATE OF ORDER: 20 MAY 1999
WHERE MADE: PERTH
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. A sequestration order be made against the estate of Derek Hughes and Sandra Anne Hughes. 2. Mr Holbrook be appointed as trustee of the estate of Derek Hughes and Sandra Anne Hughes subject to a consent to act being filed today. 2. Mr Holbrook's costs of and incidental to both applications including reserved costs be taxed and paid out of the estate. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules. IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA WG 7138 of 1998
WESTERN AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY WG 7130 of 1998
BETWEEN: DEREK HUGHES and SANDRA ANNE HUGHES
Applicants (Respondents)
AND: KIM DAVID HOLBROOK
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate