Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Scott v Bagshaw [1999] FCA 674
JOHN JOSEPH SCOTT v LEITH GORDON BAGSHAW AND JUDITH HAMPTON BAGSHAW AND PHILLIP GREGORY JEFFERSON AND JAY ARSCOTT STEVENSON AS TRUSTEES OF THE BANKRUPT ESTATE OF LEITH GORDON BAGSHAW
NG 1061 OF 1998
RYAN, MOORE AND MARSHALL JJ 21 MAY 1999 SYDNEY
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY NG 1061 OF 1998
ON APPEAL FROM A JUDGMENT OF A SINGLE JUDGE OF THE FEDERAL
COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BETWEEN: JOHN JOSEPH SCOTT
Appellant
AND: LEITH GORDON BAGSHAW
First Respondent
JUDITH HAMPTON BAGSHAW
Second Respondent
PHILLIP GREGORY JEFFERSON AND JAY ARSCOTT STEVENSON AS TRUSTEES OF THE BANKRUPT ESTATE OF LEITH GORDON BAGSHAW
Third Respondent
JUDGES: RYAN, MOORE AND MARSHALL JJ
DATE OF ORDER: 21 MAY 1999
WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
MINUTES OF ORDER
THE COURT ORDERS: 1. That the appeal be allowed. 2. That the orders of Whitlam J of 21 September 1998 be set aside. 3. That the application be remitted to Whitlam J to determine such of the issues between the parties as may be necessary, in the light of the reasons of the Full Court published this day, to dispose of the action. 4. That the costs of the proceedings before Whitlam J abide the determination by him of the issues referred to in paragraph 3 of this Order. 5. That the respondents pay the appellant's costs of the appeal, such costs to be taxed in default of agreement. Note:Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY NG 1061 OF 1998
ON APPEAL FROM A JUDGMENT OF A SINGLE JUDGE OF THE FEDERAL
COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BETWEEN: JOHN JOSEPH SCOTT
Appellant
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate