Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA John James Memorial Hospital Ltd v Keys [1999] FCA 678
NEGLIGENCE – Action by elderly patient against hospital – Fall in bathroom – Patient under medication likely to cause drowsiness and confusion – Liability of hospital for any failure of communication by treating medical practitioner – State of knowledge of nursing sister.
DAMAGES – Inadequacy of award for general damages. THE JOHN JAMES MEMORIAL HOSPITAL LIMITED v DULCIE BERYL KEYS AG103 of 1998
GALLOP, WILCOX and WHITLAM JJ CANBERRA 21 MAY 1999
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY DISTRICT REGISTRY AG103 OF 1998
ON APPEAL FROM A JUDGE OF THE SUPREME COURT
OF AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY
BETWEEN: THE JOHN JAMES MEMORIAL HOSPITAL LIMITED
Appellant
AND: DULCIE BERYL KEYS
Respondent
JUDGES: GALLOP, WILCOX and WHITLAM JJ
DATE OF ORDER: 21 MAY 1999
WHERE MADE: CANBERRA
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. The appeal be dismissed. 2. The cross-appeal be allowed. 3. The judgment of the trial judge be set aside. 4. Judgment be entered for the respondent in the sum of $82,448 plus costs. 5. The appellant pay the costs of the appeal and the cross-appeal. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY DISTRICT REGISTRY AG103 OF 1998
ON APPEAL FROM A JUDGE OF THE SUPREME COURT
OF AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY
BETWEEN: THE JOHN JAMES MEMORIAL HOSPITAL LIMITED
Appellant
AND: DULCIE BERYL KEYS
Respondent
JUDGES: GALLOP, WILCOX and WHITLAM JJ
DATE: 21 MAY 1999
PLACE: CANBERRA
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT 1 THE COURT: This is an appeal against a decision of the Supreme Court of the Australian Capital Territory (Miles CJ) in an action for damages brought by the respondent (to whom we shall refer as the plaintiff) against The John James Memorial Hospital Limited ("the hospital"). The plaintiff claimed the hospital acted negligently in relation to two falls she experienced whilst she was a patient in the hospital.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate