Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Sheahan v Cooper [1999] FCA 766 BANKRUPTCY – agreement to transfer share of property – whether agreement created a trust in the equitable interest in the property – transfer occurred later – whether transfer a sham under s 120 – whether interest transferred at all – whether consideration existed for the transfer – whether transfer for market value. BANKRUPTCY – whether bankrupt was, or was about to become insolvent at the time of transfer of land. TRUSTS – whether constructive trust could be created where trustee in bankruptcy asserted title. TRUSTS – apportionment of interests under Baumgartner principle. Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) ss 116, 120 and 121 Bankruptcy Legislation Amendment Act 1996 Sch 1 Pt 2 Item 457 Baumgartner v Baumgartner (1987) 164 CLR 137 applied Sharrment Pty Ltd v Official Receiver in Bankruptcy (1988) 18 FCR 449 considered Donnelly (Trustee of Estate of Edelsten) v Edelsten (1994) 49 FCR 384 considered Ex parte Holthausen; Re Scheibler (1874) LR 9 Ch App 722 considered Re Bastable; Ex parte Trustee [1901] 2 KB 518 considered Re Sharpe [1980] 1 All ER 198 considered Muschinski v Dodds (1985) 160 CLR 583 applied Osborn; Ex parte Trustee of the Property of Osborn (A Bankrupt) v Osborn (1990) 25 FCR 547 distinguished Calverley v Green (1985) 155 CLR 242 considered Ashton v Prentice (Federal Court, Hill J, unreported, 23 October 1998) considered
JOHN SHEAHAN as Trustee of the Bankrupt Estate of RICHARD JOHN COOPER v NOELENE MICHELLE COOPER S 7017 OF 1999
MANSFIELD J ADELAIDE 8 JUNE 1999
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
SOUTH AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY S 7017 OF 1999
IN THE MATTER OF THE BANKRUPT ESTATE OF
RICHARD JOHN COOPER
BETWEEN: JOHN SHEAHAN
as Trustee of the Bankrupt Estate of
RICHARD JOHN COOPER
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate