Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Saadik v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [1999] FCA 825 MIGRATION – review of Refugee Review Tribunal decision – non-disclosure to applicants of "independent" evidence – inquisitorial function of Tribunal – s 425(1)(a) Migration Act 1958 – absence of evidence in support of alleged injuries – ss 476(1)(e) and (g) Migration Act 1958 Migration Act 1958 ss 420(2)(b), 425 and 476 Kioa v West (1985) 159 CLR 550 referred to Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs v Eshetu (1997) 162 ALR 577 referred to Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs v Capitly [1999] FCA 193 cited Abebe v Commonwealth of Australia (1999) 162 ALR 1 considered Sook Rye Son v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [1999] FCA 7 cited Sun Zhan Qui v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs (unreported, Lindgren J, 6 May 1997) cited Caragay v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs (1997) 49 ALD 539 referred to Meadows v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs (unreported, Full Federal Court, 23 December 1998) referred to Li v Refugee Review Tribunal (1996) 45 ALD 193 cited Chen v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [1999] FCA 34 cited Faddoul v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [1999] FCA 87 cited Doan v The Minister for Immigration, Local Government and Ethnic Affairs and K Boland (Refugee Review Tribunal) (unreported, Olney J, 9 April 1997) cited
ASHRAF MOHAMED ALSAID SAADIK v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS NG 1070 OF 1998 WALID MOHAMED ALSAYED SAADIK v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS NG 1069 OF 1998 HELY J SYDNEY 23 JUNE 1999
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY NG 1070 OF 1998
BETWEEN: ASHRAF MOHAMED ALSAID SAADIK
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate