Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Mijoljevic v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [1999] FCA 834 MIGRATION – Migration Act 1958 (Cth) – review of decision of Refugee Review Tribunal – whether error of law – proper construction of cl 866.21 and cl 866.22 of Schedule 2 of the Migration Regulations – applicant from mixed ethnic background – whether applicant's objection to military service sufficient to attract the protection of the Refugees Convention Migration Act 1958 (Cth), s 476(1)(e) Migration Regulations 1994, Schedule 2, cl 866.21, cl 866.22
Munkayilar v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (1997) 49 ALD 588, followed Marr v Australian Telecommunications Corporation (1991) 25 ALD 473, cited Bank of Western Australia v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1994) 125 ALR 605, cited Murill-Nunez v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (1995) 63 FCR 150, cited Timic v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [1998] FCA 1750, cited
Hathaway, The Law of Refugee Status MILENKO MIJOLJEVIC v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS NG 490 of 1998 BRANSON J SYDNEY 25 JUNE 1999
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY NG 490 of 1998
BETWEEN: MILENKO MIJOLJEVIC
Applicant
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS
Respondent
JUDGE: BRANSON J
DATE OF ORDER: 25 JUNE 1999
WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: The application be dismissed. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY NG 490 of 1998
BETWEEN: MILENKO MIJOLJEVIC
Applicant
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS
Respondent
JUDGE: BRANSON J
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate