Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Agnew v Secretary Department of Social Security [1999] FCA 837 SOCIAL SECURITY – constructive trust – findings of facts – consequences of those findings – intention of the parties – value of disposition PARTNERSHIP – terms of dissolution – existence and nature of partnership debt – amount of debt owing by claimants Social Security Act 1991 (Cth) s 11(1) s 1123, s 1124, Kintominas v Secretary, Department of Social Security (1991) 23 ALD 572 referred to Kidner v Secretary, Department of Social Security (1993) 31 ALD 63 referred to Giumelli v Giumelli (1999) 161 ALR 473 followed Muschinski v Dodds (1985) 160 CLR 583 applied Baumgartner v Baumgartner (1987) 164 CLR 137 applied DEAN HOWARD AGNEW AND ROSEMARY RUTH AGNEW v SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SECURITY NO SG 105 OF 1998 O'LOUGHLIN J 23 JUNE 1999 ADELAIDE
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
SOUTH AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY SG 105 OF 1998
BETWEEN: DEAN HOWARD AGNEW
First Applicant
ROSEMARY RUTH AGNEW
Second Applicant
AND: SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Respondent
JUDGE: O'LOUGHLIN J
DATE OF ORDER: 23 JUNE 1999
WHERE MADE: ADELAIDE
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. The decision of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal be set aside. 2. The matter be remitted to that Tribunal for further consideration in terms consistent with these reasons. 3. The respondent pay the costs of the applicants which costs are to be taxed in default of agreement. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
SOUTH AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY SG 105 OF 1998
BETWEEN: DEAN HOWARD AGNEW
First Applicant
ROSEMARY RUTH AGNEW
Second Applicant
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate