Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Mohammed v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [1999] FCA 868 MIGRATION – application for judicial review of decision of Refugee Review Tribunal affirming a decision to refuse to grant the applicant a protection visa – whether Tribunal erred in finding that applicant was not a person to whom Australia had protection obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees – whether Tribunal erred in finding that the applicant did not have a well-founded fear of persecution – whether error of law not to consider consequences of voluntary acts of applicant as refugee "sur place".
Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 476, 476(1)(e) Federal Court Rules O 80
C D de Jong, "The Legal Framework: The Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and the Development of Law Half a Century Later", International Journal of Refugee Law, 10, 4 (1998) G S Goodwin-Gill, The Refugee in International Law (2nd Ed), (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1996) A Grahl-Madsen, The Status of Refugees in International Law (Leyden: A W Sitjhoff, 1966) J C Hathaway, The Law of Refugee Status (Toronto: Butterworths, 1991) United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees Handbook on Procedures and Criteria for Determining Refugee Status (1979)
Somaghi v Minister for Immigration, Local Government and Ethnic Affairs (1991) 31 FCR 100 discussed Khan v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs and Refugee Review Tribunal (1997) 47 ALD 19 cited Chan Yee Kin v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (1989) 169 CLR 379 cited Nagaratnam v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (1999) 84 FCR 569 cited
ALSIDDIG ABDULLAH ADAM MOHAMMED v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS WG 174 OF 1998 LEE J 28 JUNE 1999 PERTH
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate