Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Zhang v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [1999] FCA 887
GUO RONG ZHANG V MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS NG 1156 OF 1998 Burchett J 10 June 1999 Sydney
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY NG 1156 of 1998
BETWEEN: GUO RONG ZHANG
Applicant
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS
Respondent
JUDGE: BURCHETT J
DATE: 10 JUNE 1999
PLACE: SYDNEY
EX TEMPORE REASONS FOR JUDGMENT 1 This is an application to review a decision of the Refugee Review Tribunal. I have read and considered that decision. Mr Zhang has not appeared today, notwithstanding evidence put before me which shows quite clearly that, not only was the solicitor who was originally acting for him notified of today's hearing date, but because that solicitor had indicated some difficulty in communication with his client, and a desire to withdraw from the case, at least two letters were sent directly to Mr Zhang by the solicitor handling the matter at the Australian Government Solicitor's office. At least one letter, giving adequate notice, was sent, as is shown by the affidavit verifying the sending of it, in the appropriate manner to obtain an advice receipt and delivery confirmation from Australia Post. These bear a signature purporting to be the signature of Mr Zhang, which I have compared with two signatures of his contained in the relevant documents. I am quite satisfied that Mr Zhang in fact received the letter, the signature being his signature. 2 There is authority that summary orders should not be made without some consideration of the case, and I have, as I have said, read and considered the reasons of the Tribunal in this case. I can myself find no indication of any error of law; and none has been submitted to me. As there has been no appearance, I now dismiss the application with costs. I certify that the preceding two (2) numbered paragraphs are a true copy of the Reasons for Judgment herein of the Honourable Justice Burchett.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate