Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA Ramset Fasteners (Aust) Pty Ltd v Advanced Building Systems Pty Ltd [1999] FCA 898 PATENTS – validity – novelty – whether information in several advertisements formed an allowable "mosaic" – whether pictures in advertisements revealed an anticipation of the invention – discussion of evidence of what the advertisements would have revealed to the skilled person – discussion of the test for novelty – the role of "mechanical equivalents" in the assessment of an alleged anticipation – discussion of the distinction between anticipating material from which the existence of an integer of a combination could be inferred and material from which it could be concluded the addition of an essential integer would clearly be a good idea – inventorship – infringement – discussion of the rule that sale of a component part of a combination claim for an entire machine is not an infringement – rule that in such a case the vendor must have made himself a party to the act of infringement to be liable – discussion of participation in infringement and of inducing or procuring an infringement – combination to infringe – discussion of evidence of the procurement of an infringement – discussion of the proposition that you cannot avoid infringement by making a patented machine work a little worse and then providing a remedy – whether the "substance" of an invention had been deliberately left outside the claim – discussion of damages for infringement of a patent – measure of damages by the attribution of a reasonable royalty – prima facie measure of damages of the profit the patentee could have earned – estimation where precision is impossible – whether sale of patented combination without warning to purchaser that use might involve infringement amounted to a contravention of s 52 of the Trade Practices Act 1974. TRADE PRACTICES ACT, S 52 – whether sale of patented combination without warning to purchaser that use might involve infringement amounted to a contravention of s 52 of the Trade Practices Act 1974 - discussion of the proposition that misleading conduct need not be representational – circumstances where it was more realistic to see the conduct as misleading without resort to a representational analysis – inference from the engaging by a corporation in misleading conduct and the doing of the thing to which that conduct tended that it did have a causative effect. Patents Act 1952 (Cwth), s 100 Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cwth), s 52 Advanced Building Systems Pty Ltd v Ramset Fasteners (Aust) Pty Ltd (1993) 26 IPR 171 affirmed Advanced Building Systems Pty Ltd v Ramset Fasteners (Australia) Pty Ltd (1995) AIPC 39,188 reversed in part Ramset Fasteners (Aust) Pty Ltd v Advanced Building Systems Pty Ltd (1996) 66 FCR 151 cited Advanced Building Systems Pty Ltd v Ramset Fasteners (Aust) Pty Ltd (1998) 152 ALR 604 applied Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company v Beiersdorf (Australia) Limited (1980) 144 CLR 253 applied Martin Engineering Co v Trison Holdings Pty Ltd (1989) 14 IPR 330 referred to
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate