Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Ramos v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [1999] FCA 934
MIGRATION - application for bridging visa - application for review of Immigration Review Tribunal decision - legal effect of Sch 1, subpar 1301(3)(c)(i), Migration Regulations - whether subparagraph prescribed criterion for grant of bridging visa - whether subparagraph prescribed way for making application for bridging visa - principles for construction of Schedules to legislation. Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 31(3), 37, 45, 46, 476(1), 504(1) Migration Regulations (Cth) regs 2.03(1), 2.07(1), Sch 1, item 1301(3)(c)(i), Sch 2 Capistrano v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (1997) 74 FCR 154, cited Inland Revenue Commissioners v Gittus [1920] 1 KB 563, applied Gittus v Inland Revenue Commissioners [1921] 2 AC 81, cited Re Foley; Channell v Foley (1952) 53 SR (NSW) 31, cited ANTONIO RAMOS v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS NG 1395 OF 1998 BHARAT PRASAD GAIRE v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS NG 1396 OF 1998 TAMBERLIN, SACKVILLE, KATZ JJ SYDNEY 9 JULY 1999
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY NG 1395 OF 1998
On appeal from a single Judge of the Federal Court of Australia
BETWEEN: ANTONIO RAMOS
Appellant
MINISTER OF STATE FOR IMMIGRATION & MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS AND: Respondent
JUDGES: TAMBERLIN, SACKVILLE, KATZ JJ
DATE OF ORDER: 9 JULY 1999
WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
MINUTES OF ORDER
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. The appeal be dismissed. 2. The appellant pay the respondent's costs of the proceeding. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY NG 1396 OF 1998
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate