Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Australian Competition & Consumer Commission v CC (NSW) Pty Ltd [1999] FCA 954 RESTRICTIVE TRADE PRACTICES – Price fixing – meeting of representatives of four tenderers (construction contractors) and of their Association representative prior to submission of tenders – alleged arrangement or understanding that successful tenderer pay "Special Fee" of $1,000,000 to Association and "Unsuccessful Tenderer's Fee" of $750,000 to each of the three unsuccessful tenderers – whether alleged arrangement or understanding likely to have effect of fixing, controlling or maintaining price – meaning of "arrangement or understanding" – meaning of "likely" – meaning of "controlling" – whether arrangement or understanding included terms that Fees be paid from proceeds of job, be taken into account in preparation of tenders and not be disclosed to client – requirement of undertaking of obligations rather than mere factual expectations for "arrangement or understanding" to be established – whether arrangement or understanding had likely effect of controlling price – whether degree of specificity required – whether degree of proximity between agreement or understanding and price required – whether price competition must be affected. MISLEADING CONDUCT – silence – failure by tenderer to disclose to client understanding arrived at with other tenderers – whether misleading and deceptive – absence of positive representation – no "duty" or "reasonable expectation" of disclosure. EVIDENCE – tendency evidence – allegation of price-fixing by tenderers – whether evidence relating to other projects could be used to help establish the existence of the pleaded price-fixing arrangement or understanding on particular project – need to identify relevant "facts in issue" – requirement that tendency evidence have "significant probative value". Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) ss 45(2), 45A(1), 52 Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) ss 55, 97 Jones v Dunkel (1959) 101 CLR 298, referred to Zaknic Pty Ltd v Svelte Corporation Pty Ltd (1995) 61 FCR 171, followed Aroutsidis v Illawarra Nominees Pty Ltd (1990) 21 FCR 500, referred to D F Lyons Pty Ltd v Commonwealth Bank of Australia (1991) 28 FCR 597 referred to Radio 2UE Sydney Pty Ltd v Stereo FM Pty Ltd (1982) 62 FLR 437, distinguished Newton v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1958) (PC) 98 CLR 1, referred to British Slag Ltd v Registrar of Restrictive Trading Agreements [1963] 1 WLR 727, referred to Top Performance Motors Pty Ltd v Ira Berk (Qld) (1975) 24 FLR 286 (FC), followed Trade Practices Commission v Nicholas Enterprises Pty Ltd (No 2) (1979) 40 FLR 83 referred to Hughes v Western Australian Cricket Association (Inc) (1986) 19 FCR 10, referred to Morphett Arms Hotel Pty Ltd v Trade Practices Commission (1980) 30 ALR 88 (FCA/FC), referred to Trade Practices Commission v Service Station Association Limited (1992) ATPR 41-179, distinguished Trade Practices Commission v Service Station Association Limited (1993) 44 FCR 206 (FC), distinguished Trade Practices Commission v Parkfield Operations Pty Ltd (1985) 7 FCR 534 (FC), considered Radio 2UE Sydney Pty Ltd v Stereo FM Pty Ltd (1982) 68 FLR 70 (FC), distinguished United States v Socony-Vacuum Oil Co (1940) 310 US 150, referred to Demagogue Pty Ltd v Ramensky (1992) 39 FCR 31 (FC), considered Rhone-Poulenc Agrochimie SA v UIM Chemical Services Pty Ltd (1986) 12 FCR 477(FC), applied Lam v Ausintel Investments Pty Ltd (1989) 97 FLR 458 (CA), followed Fraser v NRMA Holdings Ltd (1995) 55 FCR 452 (FC), referred to Ramset Fasteners (Aust) Pty Ltd v Advanced Building Systems Pty Ltd [1999] FCA 898 (FC), referred to Tobacco Institute of Australia Ltd v Australian Federation of Consumer Organisations Inc (No 2) (1993) 41 FCR 89 (FC), referred to RAIA Insurance Brokers Ltd v FAI General Insurance Co Ltd (1993) 41 FCR 164 (FC), referred to Briginshaw v Briginshaw (1938) 60 CLR 336, referred to Neat Holdings Pty Ltd v Karajan Holdings Pty Ltd (1992) 67 ALJR 170, referred to AUSTRALIAN COMPETITION & CONSUMER COMMISSION (formerly called "TRADE PRACTICES COMMISSION") v CC (NEW SOUTH WALES) PTY LIMITED (formerly called "CONCRETE CONSTRUCTIONS (NSW) PTY LIMITED")
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate