Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Marks v GIO [1999] FCA 1010 PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – representative or class action – claims in contract and for misleading and deceptive conduct – most claims for relief dismissed at first instance – limited damages awarded for misleading and deceptive conduct – findings on liability at first instance unanimously upheld on appeal in Full Court – division of views in Full Court on damages – non-determination of cross appeal seeking wider relief rejected at first instance – award of damages set aside without the granting of alternative relief – remittal of one issue to trial judge by Full Court – applicant's appeal dismissed by High Court for different reasons among the Justices and all different to Full Court – no ruling by High Court as a court on the remitted question – whether any limitation on the power of first instance courts where a further hearing is ordered by an appellate court – whether fresh evidence admissible –relevance of whether remitted issue was argued at trial
COSTS – appropriate considerations when both parties have lost major issues at trial and contributed to costs and delays – little attempt by parties to work out interlocutory issues without recourse to court – confrontation preferred to compromise on small issues as well as on major issues Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) s 82, s 87 Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 28(1)(c), Fair Trading Act 1987 (NSW)
Gates v City Mutual Life Assurance Society Ltd [1986] 160 CLR 1 Latoudis v Cacy [1990] 170 CLR 534; Australian Conservation Foundation v Forestry Commission (1988) 19 FCR 127, 79 ALR 685 Inn Leisure Industries Pty Limited (provisional liquidator appointed) v D F McCloy Pty Limited (No. 2) (1991) 28 FCR 172 National Mutual Life Association of Australia Ltd v Windsor [1991] 28 FCR 214 Marks & Ors v GIO Australia Holdings Ltd [1996] 63 FCR 304 Marks & Ors v GIO Holdings Ltd & Ors (No 2) [1996] 66 FCR 128 GIO Australia Holdings Ltd v Marks [1996] 70 FCR 559 Lynch v Howard [1980] 44 FLR 71 Schindler Lifts (Aust) Pty Limited v Debelak (1989) 89 ALR 272; 15 IPR 129 Commonwealth Bank of Australia v Quade [1991] 102 ALR 487 Bourke & Anor v Beneficial Finance Corporation [1994] 124 ALR 716 Marks v GIO Australia Holdings Ltd [1998] 158 ALR 333 Akins v National Australia Bank [1995] 10 LegRep SL3a Akins v National Australia Bank [1994] 34 NSWLR 155 Verna Trading Pty Ltd v New India Assurance Co Ltd [1991] 1 VR 129 Cretazzo v Lombardi (1975) 13 SASR 4 Austin v Ansett Transport Industries (Operations) Pty Ltd (Burchett J unreported 26 August 1993)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate