Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Diatlov v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [1999] FCA 1046 MIGRATION – Refugee Review Tribunal rejects claim that applicant has a well-founded fear of persecution in Estonia by reason of political opinion – whether Tribunal required to make further inquiries – significance of applicant's loss of right to permanent residence
Migration Act 1958 (Cth), ss 36(2), 65(1), 420(2)(b), 430(1)(c), 476(1)(a), 476(1)(e) Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth), Sch 2, reg 866.221 Federal Court Rules, O 80, rr 4, 5
Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Eshetu (1999) 162 ALR 577, followed Muralidharan v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (1996) 62 FCR 402, cited Sellamuthu v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [1999] FCA 247, cited Prasad v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (1985) 6 FCR 155, cited Luu v Renevier (1989) 91 ALR 39, cited RRT Reference N97/16130 (December 1997), referred to RRT Reference N97/16131 (November 1997), referred to
ANDREI DIATLOV v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS N 424 OF 1999 JUDGE: SACKVILLE J PLACE: SYDNEY DATE: 3 AUGUST 1999
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY N 424 OF 1999
BETWEEN: ANDREI DIATLOV
Applicant
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS
Respondent
JUDGE: SACKVILLE J
DATE OF ORDER: 3 AUGUST 1999
WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. The proceedings be listed for further directions at 9.30 am on 19 August 1999. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY N 424 OF 1999
BETWEEN: ANDREI DIATLOV
Applicant
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate