Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Davids Distribution Pty Ltd v National Union of Workers [1999] FCA 1108
INDUSTRIAL LAW – Termination of employment – Application for leave to appeal against interlocutory orders restraining employer from termination or requiring the reinstatement, of the employment of 53 employees – Whether primary judge erred in holding there was a serious question to be tried in relation to alleged contraventions of ss170MU and 298 of Workplace Relations Act - Whether primary judge should have disqualified himself on the ground of perceived bias – Dispute over log of claims resulted in industrial action involving picketing – Whether picketing is "industrial action" within the meaning of the Workplace Relations Act - Whether notice necessary for "protected action" was given – Whether the picketing was in concert with other unions or persons – Whether reinstatement orders may be made under s298U of the Act only after final determination of the matter.
Workplace Relations Act 1996, ss4, 170ML, 170MM, 170MO, 170MT, 170MU, 170NG, 170NH, 298K, 298L, 298U and 298V.
DAVIDS DISTRIBUTION PTY LIMITED v NATIONAL UNION OF WORKERS
NG900 of 1998
WILCOX, BURCHETT and COOPER JJ
SYDNEY
13 AUGUST 1999
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY NG 900 of 1998
ON APPEAL FROM A JUDGE OF THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BETWEEN: DAVIDS DISTRIBUTION PTY LIMITED
Applicant
AND: NATIONAL UNION OF WORKERS
Respondent
JUDGES: WILCOX, BURCHETT and COOPER JJ
DATE OF ORDER: 13 AUGUST 1999
WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. Leave be granted to appeal against the orders made by North J on 1 December 1998. 2. The appeal be dismissed.
Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate